Which blade is best? large trial tests emergency intubation tools
NCT ID NCT07223762
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This trial compares two types of video laryngoscope blades—hyperangulated and standard geometry—in critically ill adults who need a breathing tube in the emergency department or intensive care unit. About 2,500 participants will be randomly assigned to one blade type. The main goal is to see which blade leads to successful tube placement on the first try, with a secondary focus on preventing low oxygen levels during the procedure.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- video laryngoscope blade (hyperangulated or standard geometry)
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could help doctors choose the best tool for placing breathing tubes in emergency situations, potentially improving success rates and reducing complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is a device comparison study, not a new drug or cure. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and the study is not blinded, which could introduce bias.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 2,500 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Dec 2025
- Expected to finish
-
May 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria 1. Patient is located in a participating unit. 2. Planned procedure is orotracheal intubation using a laryngoscope. 3. Planned operator is a clinician expected to routinely perform tracheal intubation in the participating unit. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Patient is known to be less than 18 years old. 2. Patient is known to be pregnant. 3. Patient is known to be a prisoner. 4. Immediate need for tracheal intubation precludes safe performance of study procedures. 5. Operator has determined that use of a direct laryngoscope is required for the optimal care of the patient. 6. Operator has determined that use of a hyperangulated video laryngoscope blade or a standard geometry video laryngoscope blade is required or contraindicated for the optimal care of the patient either because of factors related to the patient (e.g., patient's upper airway anatomy requires a specific blade type) or the operator (e.g., treating clinicians lack sufficient comfort with one of the blade types).
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Acute respiratory failure are added.
Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
18 sites. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
The full official record for this study. This one lists no contact details, but it is the first place any would appear.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Baylor Scott & White Research Institute
Dallas, Texas, 75201, United States
-
Denver Health Medical Center
Denver, Colorado, 80204, United States
-
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
-
Hennepin Healthcare component - Hennepin County Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55415, United States
-
Lahey Clinic, Inc
Burlington, Massachusetts, 01805, United States
-
Lsu/Umcno
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
-
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
Jefferson, Louisiana, 70121, United States
-
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
-
Our Lady of the Lake Hospital, Inc.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808, United States
-
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
-
Sentara Norfolk General
Norfolk, Virginia, 23507, United States
-
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305, United States
-
The Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
-
University of California, Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90095, United States
-
University of Colorado, Denver Anschutz Medical Campus
Denver, Colorado, 80045, United States
-
University of Maryland Baltimore
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201, United States
-
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232, United States
-
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27109, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A global effort to make moving critically ill patients safer
- Healing together: could a Couples-Based program ease ICU aftermath?
- Are ventilated patients starving in silence? a new study investigates
- Can a simple inhaled combo keep pneumonia patients off ventilators?
- Can a Diaphragm-Sensing ventilator mode reduce breathing asynchrony?
- Which oxygen strategy saves more lives? large trial puts three methods to the test