Den här översättningen är inte klar ännu. Den här sidan är just nu på engelska.

Gå till den engelska sidan

3D printing vs milling: which dental filling lasts longer?

NCT ID NCT07195201

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study will compare two ways of making onlay restorations (a type of dental filling for back teeth): 3D printing and CAD/CAM milling. Twenty-nine adults will receive one onlay made by each method on opposite sides of their mouth. Researchers will check how well they hold up over 18 months, looking at fit, appearance, and any side effects.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
dental onlay restoration (3D printed resin or CAD/CAM milled ceramic)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that 3D printed onlays are as good as or better than milled ones, offering a more affordable or faster option for dental restorations.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 29 people, so results may not apply to everyone. Both methods are already used in dentistry, so no major breakthrough is expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

About 29 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Nov 2025

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Aug 2027

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 84 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Participant-Level Criteria * Adults aged 18-84 years * No active periodontal disease (probing depth ≤ 3 mm, no clinical attachment loss) * No parafunctional habits such as bruxism, clenching, or foreign object chewing * Willingness to attend regular follow-up visits during the study period * Adequate oral hygiene status * No history of systemic disease or medically stable condition if present * No history of similar restorative procedures involving the target teeth Tooth-Level Criteria * Vital posterior teeth (premolars or molars) confirmed by thermal or electric pulp testing; teeth requiring endodontic treatment or with necrosis will be excluded * Permanent posterior teeth located in functional occlusion (premolar or molar region) * Teeth with moderate structural loss suitable for onlay restorations, including mesio-occlusal (MO), disto-occlusal (DO), or mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavities with partial crown loss but sufficient remaining tooth structure not requiring full coverage * Periodontally healthy teeth with no mobility, no clinical attachment loss, and probing depth ≤ 3 mm * Teeth that can be matched in contralateral quadrants to allow split-mouth design (structurally and clinically comparable teeth) * Teeth free from cracks, fractures, or internal resorption; supporting tissues without structural defects that may compromise restoration success * Teeth with clearly defined preparation margins located in enamel or sound dentin; subgingival margins extending deep into the sulcus will not be included * Teeth without previous extensive prosthetic restorations (crowns, inlays/onlays, or implant-supported restorations) * Opposing natural teeth in stable occlusal contact with the restored tooth Exclusion Criteria: * Teeth with pulp necrosis or a history of endodontic treatment (previous root canal therapy or non-vital teeth) * Teeth with excessive tissue loss requiring full crown coverage and unsuitable for onlay restoration * Teeth presenting with cracks, fractures, internal or external resorption, or structural defects compromising prognosis * Advanced periodontal disease, including clinical attachment loss, furcation involvement, mobility, or probing depth \> 3 mm * Teeth with subgingival cavity margins extending deep into the gingival sulcus, increasing periodontal risk * Teeth with a history of fixed prosthetic restorations (previous crowns, inlays/onlays, or bridge restorations) * Teeth lacking proximal contacts due to adjacent tooth absence, leading to compromised contact stability and occlusal load distribution * Teeth in regions with orthodontic appliances or fixed retainers that may interfere with restorative procedures or evaluation * Opposing teeth absent or lacking stable occlusal contact with the restoration site * Patients with systemic diseases contraindicate elective dental treatment (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised status) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Patients unable or unwilling to attend scheduled follow-up visits \[baseline (1 week), 6 months, 12 months, and 18 months\]

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for 3D printing are added.

Vår säkerhetsrekommendation!

Genom att skicka in godkänner du våra Användarvillkor

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The places running it

    1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.

  2. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  3. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Mersin University, Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry

    Mersin, Yenisehir, 33343, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.