Cast length showdown: does a shorter cast speed wrist fracture recovery?

NCT ID NCT07704879

First seen Jul 15, 2026 · Last updated Jul 16, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two casting strategies for adults with a broken wrist (distal radius fracture) that was set without surgery. One group wears a below-elbow cast from the start, while the other wears an above-elbow cast for two weeks before switching to a below-elbow cast. Researchers measure muscle strength, pain, stiffness, and long-term function to see which approach leads to better recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
casting procedure (below-elbow cast or initial above-elbow cast followed by below-elbow cast)
What this could lead to
If one casting method proves better, it could lead to faster recovery of arm strength and less stiffness after a wrist fracture.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with 93 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The difference between casting types might be small or not clinically meaningful.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

radius fracture Wrist Fractures

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology

    Istanbul, 34093, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.