VR vs. books: which teaches anatomy better?
NCT ID NCT07361913
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compares virtual reality (VR) training to standard teaching for novice anaesthetists learning anatomy. 102 resident anaesthetists will try both methods and take a test to see which helps them learn better. The goal is to find out if VR is a good alternative to traditional teaching.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EDUCATION, MEDICAL are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Virtual reality may replace needles for dental fear?
- Virtual reality may replace painkillers for Post-Surgery discomfort
- Can a custom training boost anal cancer screening in nigeria?
- Role-Play videos may boost Doctor-Team communication training
- Could a VR headset replace painkillers for toenail surgery?
- Could virtual reality help lungs heal faster after surgery?