Newer vaginal surgery for hysterectomy may be as safe as standard keyhole method
NCT ID NCT05031182
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared two surgical techniques for removing the uterus (hysterectomy) due to non-cancerous conditions: the newer vNOTES method (done through the vagina) and standard laparoscopy (keyhole surgery). 145 women took part, and researchers tracked complications, pain, and recovery for six months after surgery. The goal was to see if vNOTES is as safe and well-tolerated as the traditional laparoscopic approach.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
145 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Oct 2021
- Finished
-
Feb 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 70 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Adult woman eligible for total hysterectomy for benign lesions with or without bilateral adnexectomy. * Able to give informed consent to participate in research. * Affiliation to a Social Security scheme. Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Contraindication to the laparoscopic approach * Contraindication to first vNOTES, in particular: virginity, history of rectal surgery, rectovaginal endometriosis, high active genital infection * Indications for another concomitant surgical procedure (other than procedure on the appendix) * Indication of hysterectomy for malignant lesion. * Any concomitant pathology deemed incompatible with the study. * COVID not cured or SARS-COv2 positivity dating less than 3 days before surgery. * Adult patient protected, under guardianship or curatorship or legal safeguard * Refusal of participation.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Benign uterine lesion are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CH d'Issoire
Issoire, France
-
CHU clermont-ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a smart sensor rebuild pelvic health after hysterectomy?
- Can a routine surgical step prevent ureter injuries in hysterectomy?
- A simple pressure test before surgery might reveal your risk of chronic pain
- Can a ketamine boost during surgery slash opioid needs?
- Can watching videos before surgery calm nerves?
- Can a targeted nerve block cut opioid use after hysterectomy?