Virtual reality vs. Low-Reality: which trains better for saving newborns?

NCT ID NCT06776211

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether virtual reality or low-reality simulation is more effective for teaching neonatal resuscitation skills. Researchers enrolled 80 fourth-year midwifery students and measured their knowledge and skills using standard forms. The goal is to find the best training method to prepare healthcare workers for real-life emergencies.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Virtual reality simulation and low-reality simulation

What this could lead to

If this works, it could point toward better, more engaging ways to train healthcare workers in life-saving newborn resuscitation skills.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with 80 students from one university, so results may not apply broadly. It measures knowledge and skills in a test setting, not real-life outcomes.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for VIRTUAL REALITY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • University of Health Sciences

    Istanbul, 34668, Turkey (Türkiye)