Eardrum repair showdown: which surgical technique wins for better hearing?

NCT ID NCT07149480

First seen Jun 26, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 26, 2026

Summary

This study compares two surgical techniques for repairing large eardrum holes caused by chronic ear infections. The interlay method places the graft between eardrum layers, while the underlay method places it beneath. Researchers measured hearing improvement in 60 adults to see which technique works better. The goal is to help surgeons choose the best approach for restoring hearing.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
surgical procedure (interlay or underlay tympanoplasty)
What this could lead to
If one technique proves better, it could guide surgeons to choose the method that offers better hearing recovery for patients with chronic ear infections.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with only 60 participants, so results may not apply to all patients. The techniques are already established, so no major breakthrough is expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CHRONIC OTITIS MEDIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

chronic otitis media conductive hearing loss disorder Hearing Loss, Conductive Tympanic Membrane Perforation

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Shaikh Zayed Medical college/hospital, Lahore

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.