Runners put to the test: polarized, pyramidal, or threshold training – which wins?
NCT ID NCT07565168
First seen May 08, 2026 · Last updated May 08, 2026
Summary
This study compared three different ways to distribute training intensity (polarized, pyramidal, and threshold) in 24 recreational runners over 8 weeks. The goal was to see which approach leads to the best improvements in endurance, running economy, and fitness markers like VO₂max. Results help runners and coaches choose the most effective training plan.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AEROBIC PERFORMANCE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Cam. del Molino, 5, Fuenlabrada, Madrid
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28943, Spain
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.