Which running plan works best? study tests three intensity strategies
NCT ID NCT07565168
First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at three different ways to distribute training intensity—polarized, pyramidal, and threshold—in recreational distance runners. Twenty-four runners followed an 8-week program to see which method improved their endurance, running economy, and 5-kilometer time trial performance the most. The goal is to help runners train smarter based on scientific evidence.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this study could help recreational runners choose the most effective training intensity plan to improve their endurance and race times.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to all runners. It compares training methods, not a treatment, so no major risks are involved.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AEROBIC PERFORMANCE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Cam. del Molino, 5, Fuenlabrada, Madrid
Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28943, Spain
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can All-Out sprints reshape the Thyroid's response?
- Cycling vs. running: is your heart rate lying to you at key exercise thresholds?
- Squat science: which variation builds stronger muscles?
- Cycling tests reveal how Athletes' bodies respond to exercise stress
- Can exercise type boost your immune system? small study suggests maybe
- Power nap for athletes: does a 30-Minute snooze beat mental fatigue?