Which running plan works best? study tests three intensity strategies

NCT ID NCT07565168

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at three different ways to distribute training intensity—polarized, pyramidal, and threshold—in recreational distance runners. Twenty-four runners followed an 8-week program to see which method improved their endurance, running economy, and 5-kilometer time trial performance the most. The goal is to help runners train smarter based on scientific evidence.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If successful, this study could help recreational runners choose the most effective training intensity plan to improve their endurance and race times.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study with only 24 participants, so results may not apply to all runners. It compares training methods, not a treatment, so no major risks are involved.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for EXERCISE PHYSIOLOGY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Cam. del Molino, 5, Fuenlabrada, Madrid

    Fuenlabrada, Madrid, 28943, Spain