Digital vs. manual marking for cataract surgery: which is more accurate?
NCT ID NCT07176897
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026
Summary
This study looked at 41 adults aged 50-90 who had cataract surgery with a special lens that corrects astigmatism. Doctors compared two methods of marking the eye before placing the lens: a digital marker and a conventional manual marker. The goal was to see which method gives better lens positioning and vision results.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If digital marking proves more accurate, it could improve cataract surgery outcomes for people with astigmatism.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study with only 41 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The difference in marking methods may not lead to better vision in practice.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ASTIGMATISM are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Colvard-Kandavel Eye Center
Encino, California, 91316, United States
-
Freedom Vision Surgery Center
Encino, California, 91316, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a simple stress ball or favorite tune replace anxiety meds during eye surgery?
- Can a bangkok community eye check reveal hidden glaucoma risks?
- Can trifocal lens implants keep night driving safe and clear?
- Which cataract tool works better? a Head-to-Head test in the same eyes
- Can a new lens design improve overnight vision correction?
- Eye scans may forecast lens misalignment after cataract surgery