Which therapy wins for tennis elbow? new study compares three techniques
NCT ID NCT06812377
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested three different mobilization techniques (Maitland, Mulligan, and radial nerve mobilization) combined with eccentric exercises in 45 adults aged 18–45 with chronic tennis elbow lasting over six weeks. The goal was to see which approach best reduces pain, improves hand grip strength, and eases daily function. Results were measured after four weeks of treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for TENNIS ELBOW are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
Al Kharj, 16242, Saudi Arabia
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Mind over elbow: can beliefs predict how tennis elbow patients respond to treatment?
- Keyhole vs open surgery for tennis elbow: which offers better pain relief?
- New combo therapy for tennis elbow shows promise in small trial
- Botox for tennis elbow? new study tests pain relief
- Wrist or shoulder? study tests best exercise for tennis elbow relief
- Shockwave or simple exercises? new study aims to settle tennis elbow debate