Can Computer-Controlled sedation reduce breathing risks during spine surgery?

NCT ID NCT07745348

First seen Aug 04, 2026 · Last updated Aug 05, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two ways of giving sedation during kyphoplasty, a procedure to treat spinal fractures, performed while the patient lies face down. One method uses a computer-controlled infusion of the sedative propofol, while the other relies on manual dosing. The main goal is to see which approach leads to fewer episodes of low oxygen or pauses in breathing. The trial also looks at how quickly patients wake up and recover, as well as satisfaction from both patients and surgeons.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol compared with manually administered total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA)
What this could lead to
If TCI proves safer, it could become the preferred sedation method for spine surgeries, reducing breathing complications and improving recovery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study, so results may not apply broadly. Individual responses to sedation vary, and the study does not guarantee a clear advantage for TCI.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for END TIDAL CARBON DIOXIDE are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Seniyye Ülgen Zengin

    Istanbul, Maltepe, 34854, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.