Which anesthesia model keeps patients more stable during spine surgery?

NCT ID NCT07586189

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two computer-controlled methods (Eleveld and Schnider) for giving propofol anesthesia during spinal fusion surgery. Fifty adults will be randomly assigned to one method, and researchers will track blood pressure, heart rate, and brain activity to see which model provides more stable sedation. The goal is to find which approach leads to fewer drops in blood pressure or other complications during the start of anesthesia.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
propofol
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors choose the best anesthesia model for safer, more stable sedation during spinal surgery.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage study with only 50 participants, so results may not apply to all patients or surgeries. It compares existing methods, not a new treatment.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANESTHESIA DEPTH MONITORING are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Study contacts

  • Contact

    Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

Locations

  • Istanbul University

    RECRUITING

    Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)

    Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.