Which airway device seals better during laparoscopic surgery?

NCT ID NCT07692139

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting This study
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Jul 09, 2026 · Last updated Jul 22, 2026 · Updated 3 times

Summary

This study compares two supraglottic airway devices — the i-gel and the SaCoVLM — in adults having elective laparoscopic gallbladder removal. Researchers will measure how well each device seals the airway, how easily it is inserted, and any complications. The goal is to see which device provides safer and more effective ventilation during this type of surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one device performs better, it could guide anesthesiologists in choosing a safer, more effective airway tool for similar surgeries.
What could go wrong
This is a small observational study, not a randomized trial, so results may not apply broadly. Differences between devices may be small or not clinically meaningful.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

About 80 people

The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.

Expected to start

Jun 2026

An estimate. Start dates often move.

Expected to finish

Dec 2026

An estimate. End dates often move.

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The study population will consist of adult patients aged 18-70 years with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III who are scheduled to undergo elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia at Samsun City Hospital. Eligible patients who provide written informed consent and meet the study inclusion criteria will be consecutively enrolled during the study period.

Ages

18 to 70 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Age between 18 and 70 years. * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III. * Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. * Patients undergoing general anesthesia. * Patients who provide written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: \-

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for End tidal carbon dioxide are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

How to take part

Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.

  1. The official record

    ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.

    Open the record ↗

  2. A doctor treating you

    A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.