Heart valve mystery: why do some TAVI replacements fail faster?
NCT ID NCT05758662
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at why some replacement heart valves (TAVI) may wear out faster than others. Researchers will use special PET-CT scans to detect early signs of valve damage in 180 people who had TAVI about five years ago. They want to see if small blood clots on the valve or the type of valve used affect how long the valve lasts.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
About 180 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Nov 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Oct 2026
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Patients who underwent TAVI about five years ago will be consecutively screened for eligibility from the ongoing, prospective, TAVI registries of the participating study sites and will be asked to undergo hybrid PET-CT imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Successful TAVI with Sapien or CoreValve Evolut prosthesis about 5 years ago * Able to undergo hybrid 18F-NaF PET-CT imaging and transthoracic echocardiography * Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: * Temporary or chronic oral anticoagulation use after TAVI * Known severe renal insufficiency * Known severe paravalvular regurgitation * History of valve-in-valve procedure * History of aortic valve re-intervention (including percutaneous paravalvular leak closure)
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Aortic valve stenosis are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
4 sites in 3 countries. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Amsterdam UMC
RECRUITINGAmsterdam, Netherlands
-
Rigshospitalet
RECRUITINGCopenhagen, Denmark
-
St. Antonius Hospital
RECRUITINGNieuwegein, Utrecht, 3435 CM, Netherlands
-
University of Edinburgh
NOT_YET_RECRUITINGEdinburgh, United Kingdom
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- One scan to rule them all? new CT aims to replace multiple heart tests
- Which heart valve design wins for small aortic openings?
- Can a less invasive valve replacement tame a failing aortic valve?
- Can a new heart valve match the safety of proven ones?
- Can a single stitch beat a double closure for TAVI patients?
- Can a fitness app boost recovery after heart valve replacement?