New study aims to cut unnecessary pacemakers after TAVI
NCT ID NCT05308888
First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looks at whether inflammation after a minimally invasive heart valve replacement (TAVI) can cause dangerous heart rhythm problems. Researchers will use a special PET scan to measure inflammation in the heart's electrical pathways. The goal is to better predict which patients truly need a pacemaker, avoiding unnecessary implants and their risks.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- 18F-FDG (a radioactive tracer used in PET scans)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help doctors predict which patients truly need a pacemaker after TAVI, avoiding unnecessary implants and their complications.
- What could go wrong
- This is an early exploratory study with only 100 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. It uses imaging to observe inflammation, not to test a new treatment.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
CHU de Brest
RECRUITINGBrest, 29609, France
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a single stitch beat a double closure for TAVI patients?
- Can a fitness app boost recovery after heart valve replacement?
- A new heart valve without Open-Heart surgery: can it help High-Risk patients?
- Can a single antiplatelet drug beat aspirin after heart valve replacement?
- Can common heart-surgery practices trigger delirium? a 5,600-patient hunt for clues.
- Which heart valve works best for small aortic openings? a Head-to-Head trial