Can a less invasive hip surgery speed up recovery?

NCT ID NCT05147207

Completed Disease control Sponsor: Dr. Gavin Wood Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Aug 12, 2026 · Last updated Aug 13, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares two surgical approaches for total hip replacement: the minimally invasive SuperPATH technique and the conventional posterior approach. Adults with hip arthritis or related conditions are randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The study tracks recovery through functional tests, pain scores, and return to work over two years, aiming to see if the less invasive method offers meaningful advantages.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Minimally invasive surgical procedure (SuperPATH approach) for total hip replacement
What this could lead to: If SuperPATH proves better, it could mean faster recovery, less pain, and quicker return to daily activities after hip replacement.
What could go wrong: This is a small, single-center trial, and results may not apply to all patients. The procedure is technically demanding and may carry risks similar to standard surgery.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AVASCULAR NECROSIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

avascular necrosis osteoarthritis rheumatoid arthritis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HIP ARTHROPATHY SURGICAL APPROACH

Contacts and locations

Locations

Kingston General Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7, Canada

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.