Which stretch wins? study tests PNF vs. static stretching for muscle balance
NCT ID NCT07589712
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at how two different stretching techniques—PNF and static stretching—affect the strength balance between hamstrings and quadriceps in 23 healthy young men. Each participant tried both stretches on separate days, and their muscle strength was measured right after. The goal was to see which method might be better for muscle balance and performance.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could help athletes and trainers choose the best stretching method for muscle balance and injury prevention.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed study in healthy young men only. Results may not apply to other groups or predict long-term effects.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MUSCLE STRENGTH are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Gumushane Univetsity
Gümüşhane, Trabzon, Ordu, Giresun, Rize, Artvin, Gümüşhane, 29600, Turkey (Türkiye)
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can the shape of your foot arch predict your balance?
- Plant-Powered Omega-3 and lifting weights: a brain and muscle boost?
- Can nerve changes explain Age-Related muscle loss?
- Squats vs hip thrusts: which really shapes the glutes?
- Tightening the band: could restricted blood flow supercharge athletes?
- Electric zaps to the forearm: a quick boost for grip and reflexes?