New study tests best ways to help high-risk smokers kick the habit
NCT ID NCT04798664
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study compared four different smoking cessation programs to see which one works best for underserved smokers who are getting lung cancer screening. Over 3,200 participants from four U.S. health systems took part. The goal was to help them quit smoking for at least six months, confirmed by a test.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SMOKING CESSATION are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Geisinger
Danville, Pennsylvania, 17822, United States
-
Henry Ford Health System
Detroit, Michigan, 48202, United States
-
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Oakland, California, 94612, United States
-
Lancaster General Health
Lancaster, Pennsylvania, 17601, United States
-
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a Two-Drug combo break the smoking habit?
- Personalized nicotine patch dosing may boost quit rates
- Talking it out: could a Conversation-Based approach curb smoking in future nurses?
- A stronger nicotine patch might break the dual Smoking-Vaping habit
- Free meds could boost quit rates in stroke survivors
- Can a phone app help Spanish-Speaking smokers kick the habit?