Soap vs. antiseptic: which daily wash better cleans kids' skin in the ICU?

NCT ID NCT04117776

First seen Nov 01, 2025 · Last updated Jun 22, 2026 · Updated 31 times

Summary

This completed study tested whether washing children in the intensive care unit with a 2% chlorhexidine pad reduces skin bacteria more effectively than washing with mild soap. Researchers took skin samples from 34 children before and after each wash to measure bacterial levels. The goal was to see which method keeps skin cleaner for longer, which may help prevent infections from medical devices like central lines.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades

    Paris, Paris, 75015, France

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Chlorhexidine Gluconate 2% pad

What this could lead to

If chlorhexidine works better than mild soap, it could help reduce skin bacteria in hospitalized children, potentially lowering infection risks.

What could go wrong

This is a very small, early-stage study (34 children) that only measures short-term bacterial levels, not actual infection rates. Results may not apply to all children or settings.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.