Cure My Disease

Don't miss your cure!

 Log in / Sign up

Stretching showdown: which method helps scoliosis best?

NCT ID NCT07205770

Completed Symptom relief Sponsor: Gönül Elpeze Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two stretching techniques—Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Passive Stretching—in 28 people with mild scoliosis (ages 14-65). The goal was to see which method better improves head position and spine endurance. Participants did exercises and had their measurements taken. The trial is now complete.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Passive Stretching
What this could lead to
If it works, this could point toward a more effective stretching routine for people with scoliosis to improve posture and back endurance.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 28 participants and mild scoliosis (Cobb angle ≤10°). Results may not apply to more severe cases or general populations.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for SCOLIOSIS IDIOPATHIC ADOLESCENT TREATMENT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

adolescent idiopathic scoliosis scoliosis

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

SCOLIOSIS IDIOPATHIC ADOLESCENT TREATMENT

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University

    Gaziantep, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.