Can a different bracket setup save tooth roots during braces?

NCT ID NCT07744685

First seen Aug 04, 2026 · Last updated Aug 05, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial compares three orthodontic techniques for pulling the upper front teeth backward in adults with Class II malocclusion. All methods use small temporary screws for anchorage, but they differ in bracket design and archwire setup. The goal is to see which approach causes the least root shortening, a common side effect of braces. Sixty adults will be randomly assigned to one of the three methods, and X-rays will track root length changes over time.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Three orthodontic retraction techniques: bidimensional bracket system, hybrid dual-section archwire, and conventional sliding mechanics, all using miniscrew anchorage.
What this could lead to
If one method proves gentler on tooth roots, it could guide orthodontists toward safer treatment choices, reducing the risk of permanent root shortening for patients.
What could go wrong
This is a small, early-stage trial, and results may not apply to all patients. Root resorption is measured on X-rays, which may not capture the full picture, and individual variation is high.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CLASS II DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry

    Damascus, DM20AM19, Syria

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.