Robot vs. surgeon: which breast cancer surgery makes patients happier?
NCT ID NCT03440398
First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study compared two types of nipple-sparing mastectomy for breast cancer: one done with a robot and the other with traditional open surgery. 82 women took part, and the main goal was to see which approach led to higher patient satisfaction. The trial also looked at recovery time and complications.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Robotic surgery procedure
- What this could lead to
- If successful, robotic surgery could offer better cosmetic results and shorter hospital stays for women needing mastectomy.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, completed trial with 82 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Robotic surgery also carries risks like infection or complications.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BREAST CANCER are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
European Institute of Oncology
Milan, 20141, Italy
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a radioactive tracer pinpoint Cancer's first stop?
- Can a personalized exercise program boost recovery in cancer survivors?
- Smartwatch could spot nerve damage before it starts
- Could ionized gas help fight breast cancer after surgery?
- Radiation may let breast cancer patients keep their nipple
- Can a smart digital program restore sleep for cancer survivors?