Robot vs. laparoscope: which hernia surgery is better?

NCT ID NCT05839587

Completed Symptom relief Sponsor: University of Southern Denmark Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compared two types of minimally invasive surgery for fixing inguinal hernias: robotic-assisted and standard laparoscopic. 150 adults were randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The goal was to see if the robot's better vision and flexibility reduce the body's stress response and improve recovery. Researchers measured blood markers of inflammation and other outcomes like blood loss and hospital stay.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Robotic-assisted surgery
What this could lead to: If the robotic approach reduces surgical stress and speeds recovery, it could become a preferred option for inguinal hernia repair.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed trial comparing two surgical techniques. The robot may not show meaningful benefits over standard laparoscopy, and results may not apply to all hernia types or patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HERNIA, INGUINAL are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Hernia, Inguinal

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

HERNIA, INGUINAL LAPAROSCOPY

Contacts and locations

Locations

Sygehus Soenderjylland

Aabenraa, 6200, Denmark

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.