Rectal cancer surgery showdown: which technique saves your bowel control?
NCT ID NCT05943444
Summary
This study compares two surgical techniques for low rectal cancer to see which one better preserves patients' bowel control and quality of life after surgery. Researchers will randomly assign 256 patients to receive either the Parks or Bacon surgical method and then track their bowel function and quality of life for one year. The goal is to determine which surgical approach causes fewer bowel problems and complications after cancer removal.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes NO responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for QUALITY OF LIFE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yatsen University
RECRUITINGGuangzhou, Guangdong, China
Contact Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.