New study tests which tailbone pain treatment works best

NCT ID NCT07497269

Not yet recruiting Symptom relief Sponsor: Adana City Training and Research Hospital Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of radiofrequency treatment—pulsed and conventional—for people with long-lasting tailbone pain that hasn't improved with other treatments. Ninety adults aged 18 to 80 will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The goal is to see which method better reduces pain, improves daily function, and enhances sleep quality.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: radiofrequency ablation (pulsed or conventional)
What this could lead to: If it works, this could point toward a better, less painful treatment option for people with stubborn tailbone pain.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial with only 90 participants. It may not show a clear winner, and results might not apply to everyone with tailbone pain.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for BACK PAIN are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Back Pain coccygodynia Low Back Pain

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

BACK PAIN

Contacts and locations

Locations

Adana City Training and Research Hospital

Adana, Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
Tobb Etü Hospital

Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.