Could lying a certain way after a nerve block double its pain relief?

NCT ID NCT06441071

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 02, 2026 · Last updated Sep 03, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This trial tests whether the position a patient holds for 30 minutes after receiving a nerve block affects pain control after video-assisted chest surgery. Researchers will compare patients who lie on their back, side, or stomach after the block, and also compare the block to a standard alternative. The main goal is to see if certain positions reduce the need for opioid painkillers in the first 24 hours after surgery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Patient positioning (supine, lateral, or prone) for 30 minutes after an ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block, compared with a paravertebral block
What this could lead to
If it works, this could point to a simple, no-cost way to improve pain relief after chest surgery and reduce the need for opioid painkillers.
What could go wrong
This is an early-stage trial, and the benefit of one position over another may be small or not appear at all. Nerve blocks carry rare risks like infection or nerve damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Phase

Not a phased trial

Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.

Participants

200 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2024

Finished

May 2025

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Ages

18 to 80 years

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery under elective general anaesthesia were selected, regardless of sex, age 18-80 years, BMI: 18-30 kg.m-2, ASA classification I-III. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Allergy to the study drug or allergy to local anaesthetics; 2. History of opioid abuse; 3. Previous nerve block puncture with puncture site infection; 4. Peripheral neuropathy; 5. Coagulation abnormalities, defined as prothrombin time or partial activation time prothrombin time exceeding standard values or international normalised ratio (INR) ≥ 1.4, or platelet count ≤ 70 x 109 L-1.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Erector spinae plane block are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Nanjing First Hospital

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210006, China

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.