New chair therapy vs. traditional exercises for pelvic support
NCT ID NCT06532292
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tested two non-surgical treatments for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in 28 women: a special electromagnetic chair (HIFEM) and pelvic floor exercises with biofeedback. Both were compared to usual care (lifestyle advice). The goal was to see which approach better eases symptoms like pressure or discomfort. Participants received treatment twice a week for 8 weeks.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, Taiwan
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A virtual coach for surgery: can it empower latina patients?
- Could less gas in the belly mean less pain after pelvic surgery?
- Can a Blood-Derived injection strengthen pelvic floor repair?
- One surgery, two problems? a new approach to pelvic floor repair
- Phone call before a bladder test may ease anxiety and improve results
- Silicone splint aims to prevent prolapse from returning after surgery