Robot vs. template: which places dental screws more accurately?

NCT ID NCT07378618

First seen Jun 26, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study tested two computer-guided techniques for placing tiny screws (miniscrews) in the roof of the mouth to help with orthodontic treatment. Forty people needing these screws were randomly assigned to have them placed using either a static surgical guide (a custom template) or a dynamic navigation system (real-time tracking). The researchers measured how accurately each method placed the screws by comparing planned positions with actual positions on CT scans. The goal is to find which technique is more precise, which could lead to safer and more effective orthodontic care.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Computer-guided miniscrew insertion procedure
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help orthodontists choose the most accurate method for placing miniscrews, potentially improving treatment outcomes and reducing complications.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial focused on accuracy rather than clinical outcomes. Results may not apply to all patients or settings, and the techniques require specialized equipment and training.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MALOCCLUSION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Malocclusion

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Sapienza University of Rome

    Roma, Roma, 00161, Italy

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.