Which tube feeding method works best for head and neck cancer patients?

NCT ID NCT01536782

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study aimed to compare three tube feeding methods—bolus, gravity, and pump—in 60 head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. The goal was to see which method leads to the least weight loss and best tolerance. However, the trial was withdrawn before any patients were enrolled, so no data were collected.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
tube feeding (bolus, gravity, or pump)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could identify the most effective tube feeding method to help head and neck cancer patients maintain weight and tolerate feeds better during treatment.
What could go wrong
The trial was withdrawn before enrolling any participants, so no results are available. The findings may not apply to all patients or settings.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for HEAD AND NECK CANCER are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center at Baylor University Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.