Which tube feeding method works best for head and neck cancer patients?
NCT ID NCT01536782
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study aimed to compare three tube feeding methods—bolus, gravity, and pump—in 60 head and neck cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. The goal was to see which method leads to the least weight loss and best tolerance. However, the trial was withdrawn before any patients were enrolled, so no data were collected.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- tube feeding (bolus, gravity, or pump)
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could identify the most effective tube feeding method to help head and neck cancer patients maintain weight and tolerate feeds better during treatment.
- What could go wrong
- The trial was withdrawn before enrolling any participants, so no results are available. The findings may not apply to all patients or settings.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Start date
-
Feb 2015
- Finished
-
Feb 2017
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Males and females * 18 years or older * Diagnosis of SCCHN undergoing concurrent chemoradiation therapy (including patients who received induction therapy upfront Exclusion Criteria: * Patients who have a small bowel feeding tube (only tube feeding via pump is allowed in this case) * Patients with history of gastric surgery which may have resulted in altered gastrointestinal function * Patients with history of uncontrolled diabetes and/or gastroparesis which may interfere with gastric emptying and inability to tolerate bolus feeds * Patients at high risk of aspiration in which case slower feeds by using gravity or pump are indicated
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Head and neck cancer are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Charles A. Sammons Cancer Center at Baylor University Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- A prospective imaging study of target definition and radiation planning workflows on the integrated TrueBeam-HyperSight system for patients receiving radiation therapy
- Can a Self-Care program ease Post-Cancer swelling in the head and neck?
- Can a new targeted drug outperform standard therapy for advanced head and neck cancer?
- Blood biomarkers may foreshadow Radiation-Induced dry mouth
- Can a new antibody help the immune system fight Hard-to-Treat tumors?
- Can a smart breathing device make life with a tracheostomy more comfortable?