Keyhole surgery vs. open surgery for pancreatic cancer: which is safer?

NCT ID NCT07328607

First seen Jun 27, 2026 ยท Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study compares two types of Whipple surgery for people with pancreatic or nearby cancers: the traditional open surgery and a newer keyhole (laparoscopic) approach. About 90 adults with resectable tumors will be randomly assigned to one of the two procedures. The goal is to see if the laparoscopic method is as safe and effective as the standard open surgery, especially in terms of complications and recovery.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only โ€” not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Surgical procedure (open or laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that laparoscopic Whipple surgery is as safe as open surgery, potentially leading to faster recovery and shorter hospital stays for patients.
What could go wrong
This is a single-center trial with only 90 participants, so results may not apply broadly. Laparoscopic surgery is complex and may carry higher risks of complications in some patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AMPULLARY CARCINOMA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Liver and GIT hospital , Minia University

    RECRUITING

    Minya, Minya Governorate, 61519, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.