Can walking with poles help children with cerebral palsy walk more evenly?
NCT ID NCT07702786
First seen Jul 14, 2026 · Last updated Sep 09, 2026 · Updated 3 times
Summary
This study compares two types of walking exercise—nordic walking (using poles) and treadmill training—to see which better improves walking symmetry in children aged 6-10 with unilateral cerebral palsy (weakness on one side). Both groups also receive standard physical therapy. The goal is to measure changes in step length, stride, and joint movement. The trial aims to find a more effective way to help these children walk with less of a limp.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- nordic walking training and treadmill training
- What this could lead to
- If effective, nordic walking could become a simple, low-cost exercise to improve walking balance and coordination in children with cerebral palsy.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early-stage trial with only 30 participants, so results may not apply to all children. The training is short (15 minutes per session) and may not produce lasting changes.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Expected to start
-
Sep 2027
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2028
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
6 to 10 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Their age will range from 6-10 years, from both sexes. * Level I, II and III of gross motor functional classification system * Grade 1 and 1+ spasticity according to the Modified Ashworth Scale Exclusion Criteria: * Uncontrolled epilepsy. * Mental retardation or autistic features. * Significant visual or auditory problems according to medical reports (audio-vestibular and ophthalmic examination),
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cerebral palsy are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can modified music tunes boost balance in kids with cerebral palsy?
- Can a double nerve block spare kids with cerebral palsy from Post-Surgery pain?
- A Baby's fidgets may reveal brain health: study tests early warning signs
- A vast data bank could unlock secrets of bone and muscle diseases
- Toy cars as therapy: a new test for kids with cerebral palsy
- Can visual cues unlock sentence building in children with language delays?