Which injury score better predicts survival? researchers put two tools to the test

NCT ID NCT06705959

What the study statuses mean

This study's is highlighted.

Recruitment status, easiest to join first

Recruiting now
This trial is taking on new participants right now.
Not yet recruiting
Registered, but not yet taking participants.
By invitation only
Not open to general applications. Only people the study team invites can take part.
Paused
Paused for now. It may or may not start again.
Ongoing
Running, but no longer taking on new participants.
Completed This study
The trial has finished. Results may not be published yet.
Stopped early
Stopped early, before it reached the end. That can be for many reasons, including safety.
Cancelled
Cancelled before anyone took part.

Expanded access (not trials)

Expanded access
Not a trial. This treatment can be requested outside a study, case by case, for people who qualify.
Expanded access (paused)
Not a trial. The treatment can normally be requested outside a study, but is unavailable right now.
Expanded access (ended)
Not a trial. The treatment could once be requested outside a study, but no longer can.
Approved
The treatment has been approved, so it is available normally rather than through this programme.

When the status isn't known

Details not published
The full record has not been published yet, so there is little to show here.
Status unknown
This status has not been confirmed recently, so it may be out of date.

First seen Sep 10, 2026 · Last updated Sep 11, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

Researchers are comparing two injury severity scoring systems, the New Injury Severity Score (NISS) and the Injury Severity Score (ISS), to see which one better predicts death in blunt trauma patients. The study enrolls 458 trauma patients admitted to emergency rooms in Iraq. Upon admission, each patient receives both scores, and researchers track outcomes including death during hospitalization and length of stay.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to
If one scoring system proves more accurate, hospitals could use it to quickly identify the most severely injured patients and prioritize care.
What could go wrong
This is an observational study, so it cannot prove that using one score over another saves lives. Results from one conflict-affected region may not apply elsewhere.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Study facts

What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.

Participants

458 people

The number who actually took part.

Started

Jun 2026

Finished

Jun 2026

Lead sponsor

Other sponsor

The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.

Who can take part

This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.

Who is studied

The study population will consist of trauma patients aged 18 years and older who are admitted to the emergency room (ER) at Al-Kadhimiya Teaching Hospital in Baghdad, Iraq. This group will include individuals with various types of injuries, such as those from road traffic accidents, falls, and assaults, excluding burns as the primary injury.

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

Anyone

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.

Show the full entry requirements

Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.

Inclusion Criteria: * Trauma patients admitted to the emergency room (ER). * Patients with documented injury data are sufficient for calculating both the NISS and ISS. * Patients admitted to the ER within 6 hours of injury. * Patients providing informed consent (or consent obtained from a legal guardian in cases of incapacity). Exclusion Criteria: * Patients under 18 years of age. * Trauma cases involving burns as the primary injury. * Patients with incomplete medical records or insufficient data to calculate NISS and ISS. * Patients with pre-existing terminal conditions (e.g., advanced cancer, end-stage organ failure) unrelated to the trauma. * Patients who died on arrival or before NISS/ISS assessment could be performed. * Cases involving pregnant patients, if the primary focus of injury and risk assessment is maternal-fetal outcomes.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Trauma are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • College of Medicine - Al-Nahrain University

    Baghdad, Iraq

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.