Heart surgery ventilation showdown: which machine breathes better?
NCT ID NCT03217305
First seen Apr 30, 2026 · Last updated May 09, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This study looked at 12 patients recovering from heart surgery who still needed help breathing from a machine. Researchers compared two different ways of giving that help: standard pressure support and a newer method that uses the patient's own breathing signals. They measured how air moved in the lungs, oxygen levels, and other breathing details to see if one method worked better.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for VENTILATOR LUNG are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.