Which intubation tool wins? new trial puts videolaryngoscope against bronchoscope

NCT ID NCT06964295

First seen Jun 24, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares two devices—a videolaryngoscope and a flexible bronchoscope—for placing a breathing tube through the nose during ear, nose, and throat surgery. Researchers will measure which device succeeds on the first try more often, and track side effects like sore throat and hoarseness. The goal is to find the safer, more effective method for patients.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

What this could lead to

If one device proves more reliable, it could become the preferred tool for nasotracheal intubation, reducing patient discomfort and injury.

What could go wrong

This is a small, early-stage study (74 participants) comparing two established devices, so any advantage may be modest or not apply to all patients.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INTUBATION COMPLICATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, South Korea