Low-Flow anesthesia: safe or germ haven?

NCT ID NCT07092046

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study checked whether using very low gas flow during anesthesia (minimal flow) leads to more germs in the breathing equipment. 140 adults having elective surgery were randomly assigned to minimal or normal flow. Researchers took swabs from the equipment and patients' noses to compare germ levels. The goal was to see if moisture buildup in minimal flow anesthesia increases infection risk.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

Sevoflurane, Propofol, Remifentanil, Rocuronium

What this could lead to

If successful, this could show that minimal flow anesthesia is safe regarding infection risk, supporting its wider use.

What could go wrong

This is a small, completed study focused on equipment contamination, not patient outcomes. Results may not apply to all settings.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for MICROBIAL COLONIZATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

infectious disease

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ankara Bilkent City Hospital

    Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)