Can less anesthesia gas be better for robotic prostate surgery?

NCT ID NCT05517551

Completed Knowledge-focused Sponsor: Ankara City Hospital Bilkent Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at two ways of giving anesthesia during robotic prostate removal surgery. One method used a low flow of gas (1 liter per minute) and the other used a normal flow (3 liters per minute). The goal was to see which one is better for breathing, heart function, and cost. The study included 68 adults having robotic prostate surgery. Researchers measured oxygen levels, gas use, and other health markers.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: desflurane
What this could lead to: If low-flow anesthesia proves safe and effective, it could become the preferred method for robotic prostatectomies, reducing costs and environmental impact.
What could go wrong: This is a small, completed study with only 68 participants. Results may not apply to other surgeries or patient groups. Low-flow anesthesia may not be suitable for all patients.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for LOW FLOW ANESTHESIA are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

prostate cancer

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

LOW FLOW ANESTHESIA NORMAL FLOW ANESTHESIA ROBOTIC SURGERY

Contacts and locations

Locations

Ankara City Hospital

Ankara, Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.