10-Year Follow-Up reveals best way to image heart arteries
NCT ID NCT06237673
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study followed 318 people with suspected coronary artery disease for about 10 years to see whether starting with a CT scan or an invasive angiogram leads to better long-term outcomes. Participants had already completed an earlier study and agreed to additional follow-up, including CT imaging and lab tests. The goal is to understand how plaque buildup in the arteries changes over time and which initial testing strategy is safer and more effective.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can common heart-surgery practices trigger delirium? a 5,600-patient hunt for clues.
- Can a phone app replace cardiac rehab? a new trial puts digital heart care to the test
- Step by step: a coaching program aims to keep heart patients moving after rehab
- Heart bypass upgrade: which Artery-Harvesting technique works best?
- Can a noble gas protect the heart during bypass surgery?
- A digital coach for the heart: app aims to keep risk factors in check after a heart attack