Your own tooth could be the best bone graft for dental implants

NCT ID NCT07324083

First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026

Summary

This study tested whether using a patient's own extracted tooth as a bone graft (AMDG) works better than a synthetic material (β-TCP) or no graft at all for preserving the jawbone after tooth removal. Twenty-two adults who needed a maxillary premolar pulled received one of the three treatments, then got a dental implant six months later with a crown placed within two days. The researchers measured bone changes, implant stability, and gum health over two years to see which approach gave the best foundation for the implant.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Autogenous mineralized dentin graft (AMDG) or beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)
What this could lead to
If successful, this could show that using a patient's own tooth as a bone graft is as good as or better than synthetic materials for preserving the jawbone before placing dental implants.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed trial with only 22 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. The approach requires a healthy healing response and may not work for patients with poor bone quality or heavy smoking habits.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ALVEOLAR RIDGE PRESERVATION are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

    Al Mansurah, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.