New combo therapy aims to stop ICU muscle wasting
NCT ID NCT05919940
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study tests whether giving ICU patients extra protein and activating their muscles early (using electrical stimulation and movement) can prevent severe muscle loss. About 40 critically ill adults on ventilators will take part. The goal is to see if this approach helps patients keep muscle mass and strength, potentially improving recovery.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 40 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
Jun 2023
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * critically ill adults (≥ 18 years of age) * newly admitted to the ICU (\<48h) * mechanically ventilated, expected to remain for at least 72h * enteral nutrition is feasible Exclusion Criteria: * a BMI \> 30 * expected death or withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments * prior neuromuscular disease (e.g. paresis, myopathies, neuropathies) * injury or disease preventing neuromuscular electrical stimulation or early mobilization (e.g., elevated intracranial pressure, unstable spine) * a pacemaker or other electronic implant * allergy to components of NMES adhesive * have been dependent during activities of daily living prior to the hospital admission * a language barrier
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Energy malnutrition protein are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
2 sites in 2 countries. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGBerlin, State of Berlin, 10117, Germany
-
Klinikum rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical Universtity of Munich
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITINGMunich, Bavaria, 81675, Germany
-
Medical University of Vienna
RECRUITINGVienna, State of Vienna, 1090, Austria
-
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
RECRUITINGUlm, 89070, Germany
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Now! project - a controlled evaluation of a physical activity program for adolescents with overweight
- Quality of life in patients having a prosthetic joint infection
- Can a chest infection leave lasting effects on daily life?
- Can rehabilitation boost confidence in fibrotic lung disease?
- Propofol vs. inhaled anesthesia: which one spares your recovery?
- Can a redesigned catheter make long-term bladder care less of a burden?