Can antibody infusions outperform antibiotics in shielding CAR-T patients from infections?

NCT ID NCT07754682

First seen Aug 10, 2026 · Last updated Aug 11, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This phase III trial is testing whether regular antibody infusions (immunoglobulin replacement therapy) can prevent infections better than standard antibiotic prophylaxis in people who have received CAR-T cell therapy for B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia or B-cell lymphoma. CAR-T treatment can leave patients with low antibody levels, making them prone to infections. The study will compare the two preventive approaches over 12 months in 228 patients aged 16 to 80, measuring how many develop recurrent or severe infections.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) compared with antibiotic prophylaxis
What this could lead to
If IgRT proves better than antibiotics, it could become the standard preventive care to reduce severe infections in patients after CAR-T therapy.
What could go wrong
The trial is still recruiting and results are not yet available. IgRT is costly and may not reduce infections more than antibiotics, which also carry risks like antibiotic resistance.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.