Hip labral tear surgery showdown: repair vs. debridement

NCT ID NCT06288867

First seen Jul 08, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026 · Updated 2 times

Summary

This study compares two arthroscopic surgeries for hip labral tears in non-athletes aged 20 to 50. One surgery repairs the torn labrum, the other removes the torn part. Researchers will measure changes in hip function and pain over time to see which approach works better.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
Arthroscopic labral repair or debridement
What this could lead to
If one surgery proves clearly better, it could become the standard approach for treating hip labral tears in non-athletes, improving pain and mobility.
What could go wrong
This is a small, single-center study with 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures carry surgical risks like infection or nerve damage.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACETABULAR LABRAL TEAR are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

Femoracetabular Impingement Hip Injuries

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Ain Shams University

    Cairo, Egypt

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.