Hip labral tear surgery showdown: repair vs. debridement
NCT ID NCT06288867
First seen Jul 08, 2026 · Last updated Jul 10, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares two arthroscopic surgeries for hip labral tears in non-athletes aged 20 to 50. One surgery repairs the torn labrum, the other removes the torn part. Researchers will measure changes in hip function and pain over time to see which approach works better.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Arthroscopic labral repair or debridement
- What this could lead to
- If one surgery proves clearly better, it could become the standard approach for treating hip labral tears in non-athletes, improving pain and mobility.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, single-center study with 60 participants, so results may not apply to everyone. Both procedures carry surgical risks like infection or nerve damage.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ACETABULAR LABRAL TEAR are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Locations
-
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Could a tiny electric needle ease your hip pain without surgery?
- Can a simple pad prevent numbness after hip surgery?
- New study tests structured exercise against standard care for chronic hip pain
- New implant may help hip tendons heal better after surgery
- Virtual reality goggles may replace some sedation during surgery
- Study aims to slash risky CT scans in trauma patients with a simple decision tool