Blood thinner flush could boost tumor biopsy success
NCT ID NCT05041335
First seen Sep 17, 2026 · Last updated Sep 18, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
Researchers test whether flushing the biopsy needle with heparin, a blood thinner, helps collect more and better tissue from solid abdominal tumors during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy. They also test whether using a microsieve to prepare the tissue improves the sample. Adults with a solid abdominal mass scheduled for this biopsy, or who had an inconclusive prior biopsy, may join. Participants are randomly assigned to have their needle flushed with heparin or saline, and to have the microsieve used or not.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- heparin flush of the biopsy needle
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could give doctors a simple way to collect more usable tissue during biopsies, which may lead to faster and more accurate cancer diagnoses.
- What could go wrong
- This is a small, early study with no guarantee that heparin improves sample quality. Heparin can increase bleeding risk, so patients with low platelets or high INR are excluded.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Expected to start
-
Nov 2025
An estimate. Start dates often move.
- Finished
-
Nov 2025
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 years and older
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Accepted
You do not need to have the condition being studied to take part.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age ≥ 18 year * Non-pregnant Patients * Patients with the presence of a solid abdominal mass as seen on diagnostic imaging \[ie. ultrasound (US), computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)\] scheduled to undergo EUS examination OR Patients who underwent a prior EUS-FNA/FNB for solid pancreatic mass and did not receive a conclusive diagnosis * Patients with platelet count \> 50,000 * Patients with International Normalized Ratio (INR) \< 1.5 Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 years * Pregnant Patients * Patients who cannot consent for themselves * Patients with anticoagulants or anti-platelet agents (excluding aspirin) within the last 7-10 days * Patients with cystic abdominal masses * Patients with a platelet count \< 50,000 * Patients with an INR \> 1.5 * Patients with a heparin or porcine allergy * Patients with prior heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) * Patient's with religious aversion to porcine-containing products
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Cancer are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can colorectal surgery patients go home in two days?
- Can a personal navigator help young cancer patients through treatment?
- Can a smartwatch predict which cancer patients return to hospital?
- Two-Drug combo aims to stall advanced breast cancer
- Could a frailty score predict which older cancer patients survive intensive care?
- Can better training get doctors to talk about what matters most to dying veterans?