Can we trust blood flow monitors during ECMO? new study aims to find out.
NCT ID NCT06593717
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study checks how well standard devices measure blood flow in patients on ECMO, a machine that adds oxygen to blood outside the body. About 30 adults on ECMO will have their blood flow measured using different methods, including ultrasound and a leg-raising test. The goal is to see which device gives accurate readings so doctors can better manage fluids and medications in the ICU.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Phase
-
Not a phased trial
Phase numbers describe drug development. The registry uses this when they do not apply, as it does for trials of devices, procedures or behaviour changes, and for observational studies.
- Participants
-
About 30 people
The number the study aims to enrol. It can still change while the study runs.
- Started
-
May 2024
- Expected to finish
-
Jan 2027
An estimate. End dates often move.
- Lead sponsor
-
Other sponsor
The registry's catch-all category, for sponsors it does not file as a company, a government agency, or a research network.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
- Ages
-
18 to 75 years
- Sex
-
Anyone
- Healthy volunteers
-
Not accepted
This study is not open to healthy volunteers. The entry requirements below say who it is open to.
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Patient receiving VV-ECMO support * Age 18 - 75 years Exclusion Criteria: * Pregnancy * Conditions not allowing for passive leg raising maneuvers, e.g. "open abdomen", known or suspected elevation of intracranial pressure, recent leg or spinal trauma or orthopedic conditions not permitting leg raising * Known ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 3 months prior to study enrollment. Suspicion of raised intracranial pressure is defined as pupil divergence (if not yet further clarified radiographically/neurologically/ophthalmologically) or signs detected in routine computed tomography scans (compressed or elapsed basal cisterns or midline shift \> 5 mm.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ARDS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
How to take part
Only the study team decides who joins. These are the ways to reach them.
-
The places running it
1 site. The list below names each one and where it is.
-
The official record
ClinicalTrials.gov lists the study team's own contact details, including names and phone numbers. We don't republish those.
-
A doctor treating you
A doctor who knows your case can contact a study site on your behalf, and can tell you whether this study is worth pursuing at all.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Medical University of Vienna
RECRUITINGVienna, 1090, Austria
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can plain water replace a common ICU mouthwash?
- Is thicker blood a hidden player in ARDS?
- Can a digital assistant and quick tests stop unnecessary antibiotics for kids?
- Ultrasound under the collarbone may help doctors decide who needs IV fluids after trauma
- A neck artery may reveal how the heart copes during lung surgery
- Can a wrist sensor cut the dose of ICU muscle relaxants?