New device aims to improve safety in heart valve replacement
NCT ID NCT07205341
First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time
Summary
This pilot study is testing a new device called HemoCept that measures blood volume and heart efficiency during trans-aortic valve replacement (TAVR) surgery for aortic stenosis. The study will enroll 20 adults aged 18-80 who need TAVR. Researchers want to see if the device's readings match standard heart measurements taken before and after the procedure.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- HemoCept device
- What this could lead to
- If successful, this could lead to a new way to monitor blood volume and heart function during TAVR surgery, potentially improving patient safety.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small pilot study with only 20 people, so results may not apply to everyone. The device is still experimental and may not work as hoped.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Boulder Heart
RECRUITINGBoulder, Colorado, 80303, United States
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- Can a single stitch beat a double closure for TAVI patients?
- Can a fitness app boost recovery after heart valve replacement?
- A new heart valve without Open-Heart surgery: can it help High-Risk patients?
- Can a single antiplatelet drug beat aspirin after heart valve replacement?
- Can common heart-surgery practices trigger delirium? a 5,600-patient hunt for clues.
- Which heart valve works best for small aortic openings? a Head-to-Head trial