Which dental tool is less painful? new trial aims to find out

NCT ID NCT06934291

Recruiting now Symptom relief Sponsor: University of Siena Source: ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 26, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study compares two types of ultrasonic devices used to clean deep gum pockets in people with early-stage periodontitis. Researchers want to see which device causes less pain, noise, and vibration during treatment, and how well each helps gums heal. Fifty-two adults will be randomly assigned to receive full-mouth cleaning with either a piezoelectric or magnetostrictive device.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance: Ultrasonic debridement device (piezoelectric or magnetostrictive)
What this could lead to: If successful, this could show which device is more comfortable and effective for treating gum disease, improving patient experience.
What could go wrong: This is a small, early-stage trial (52 people) comparing two similar devices, so differences may be minor or not apply to everyone. Results are about comfort, not a cure.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for PERIODONTITIS, ADULT are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

chronic periodontitis periodontitis periodontitis, chronic, adult

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

PERIODONTITIS, ADULT

Contacts and locations

Locations

AOUS
RECRUITING

Siena, SI, 53100, Italy

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.