IVF scheduling showdown: natural cycle vs hormone cycle for embryo transfer
NCT ID NCT06053827
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026
Summary
This study looked at over 1,200 women under 40 who had a frozen embryo transfer. Some used a natural cycle with no hormones, while others took estrogen and progesterone to mimic a natural cycle. The goal was to see which method leads to more pregnancies. Results could help clinics decide the best way to schedule transfers.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only, not medical advice or a prediction.
- What this could lead to
- If this study shows one method works better, it could help doctors choose the best approach for frozen embryo transfers, potentially improving pregnancy success rates.
- What could go wrong
- This is a completed observational study, not a controlled trial, so results may not apply to all patients. Differences in pregnancy rates could be small or due to other factors.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Study facts
What this study's own registry entry says, in plain language.
- Participants
-
1,207 people
The number who actually took part.
- Started
-
Sep 2023
- Finished
-
Jul 2024
- Lead sponsor
-
A company
The lead sponsor is a pharmaceutical, biotech, or medical-device company.
Who can take part
This study's own entry requirements. Only the study team can say for certain whether you qualify.
Who is studied
Data spreadsheet from Jan 2022 to March 2023 of patients undergoing natural or substituted frozen embryo transfer
- Ages
-
Up to 40 years
- Sex
-
Female participants only
Show the full entry requirements Hide the full entry requirements
Copied word for word from the study's registry entry, so the wording is the study team's rather than ours.
Inclusion Criteria: * Age \< 40 years old * Women having undergone either a frozen embryo transfer in natural cycle or substituted cycle * IVF and FET cycles done at Clinique OVO Exclusion Criteria: * egg or embryo recipient * History of recurrent miscarriages, defined as ≥ 3 consecutive losses * Patients that needed Viagra, Plasma-Rich Platelet (PRP) or other modalities to improve their endometrial thickness * Uterine abnormalities * Abnormal hormonal profiles * FET Stimulated cycles * History of recurrent implantation failure defined as failed ≥ 2 euploid embryos transfer or ≥ 3 blastocysts
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for Fertility disorders are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Conditions
The condition(s) this trial relates to.
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
Clinique Ovo
Montreal, Quebec, H4P 2S4, Canada
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.
- AI may spot the embryos most likely to grow
- Can mindfulness ease the emotional toll of IVF?
- Frozen hope: new study protects fertility in young cancer patients
- Hope for young cancer survivors: ovarian tissue freezing may preserve fertility
- Can a Stress-Busting app boost baby chances?
- Fertility after fibroid embolization: new data from 46 women