Robot suit vs. lead apron: which better protects surgeons?
NCT ID NCT07528144
First seen Jun 27, 2026 · Last updated Aug 14, 2026 · Updated 2 times
Summary
This study compares an exoskeleton-supported radiation protection system to standard lead aprons for vascular surgeons performing aortic repair. Two experienced surgeons will wear each device during procedures, and researchers will measure radiation exposure, muscle strain, and discomfort. The goal is to see if the exoskeleton can reduce occupational hazards.
What this could mean
Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.
- Active substance
- Exoskeleton-supported radiation protection system
- What this could lead to
- If it works, this could point toward safer working conditions for surgeons by reducing radiation exposure and physical strain.
- What could go wrong
- This is a very small, early-stage trial with only 2 participants, so results may not apply broadly. The exoskeleton might be uncomfortable or impractical in real surgeries.
This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for ENDOVASCULAR AORTIC REPAIR are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
As listed by the trial registrant
The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.
Contacts and locations
Locations
-
University Clinical Hospital No. 2, Pomeranian Medical University
RECRUITINGSzczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship, 70-111, Poland
More trials for these conditions
Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.