Which epidural method helps lung surgery patients recover faster?

NCT ID NCT05930405

First seen Jan 04, 2026 · Last updated Jun 20, 2026 · Updated 20 times

Summary

This study looked at 252 adults having lung surgery to see if giving pain medicine in small bursts (programmed intermittent bolus) works better than a steady drip (continuous infusion). Both methods use an epidural, a common pain relief technique. The goal was to find which approach leads to better recovery quality in the first few days after surgery.

Disclaimer Read more

This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for VIDEO-ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Renchun Lai

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance

epidural analgesia (local anesthetic delivered via programmed intermittent bolus or continuous infusion)

What this could lead to

If one method works better, it could improve recovery and comfort after lung surgery.

What could go wrong

This is a completed trial, but the difference between methods may be small. Results may not apply to all surgeries or patients.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.