Feeding tubes vs IV nutrition: which saves more lives after shock?
NCT ID NCT07411014
First seen Feb 17, 2026 · Last updated Apr 30, 2026 · Updated 8 times
Summary
This study looks at 1,150 critically ill adults in the ICU who are recovering from shock. Patients are randomly assigned to receive nutrition either through a feeding tube (enteral) or through a vein (parenteral). The goal is to see which method reduces deaths and infections in the ICU.
Disclaimer
Read more
Show less
This is a summary of
the original study
.
Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
This is a summary of the original study . Summaries may miss details or leave out important information. Before applying or accepting participation, make sure you have read and understood the full study. Curemydisease.com takes no responsibility whatsoever for anything missed, misunderstood, or acted upon as a result of our summary — we know it does not capture everything.
Get updates
Get notified about this study
Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for CRITICAL ILLNESS are added.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Contacts and locations
Show contact details
Enter your email to view the contact information for this study.
By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use
Study contacts
-
Contact
Phone: •••-•••-•••• Email: •••••@•••••
Locations
-
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, South Korea
Conditions
Explore the condition pages connected to this study.