Timing of labor induction after water breaks: study compares early vs. waiting

NCT ID NCT07261332

First seen Jun 25, 2026 · Last updated Jun 27, 2026 · Updated 1 time

Summary

This study looked at 88 pregnant women whose water broke before labor started, comparing those who got labor-inducing gel right away versus those who waited 24 hours. The goal was to see which approach led to shorter labor and more vaginal deliveries. The findings could help guide doctors on the best timing for induction.

What this could mean

Our plain-language read of the trial. This is informational only — not medical advice or a prediction.

Active substance
0.5mg PGE2 gel
What this could lead to
If successful, this could help doctors decide the best timing for inducing labor in women with ruptured membranes, potentially leading to safer and more efficient deliveries.
What could go wrong
This is a small, completed study with only 88 participants, so results may not apply to all women. The intervention is a standard drug, so no major new breakthrough is expected.

This is an AI summary of the original study and may miss details. Read our disclaimer.

Get updates

Get notified about this study

Sign up to get updates when this study changes or when new studies for INDUCTION OF LABOR are added.

Our safety recommendation!

By submitting, you agree to our Terms of use

Conditions

The condition(s) this trial relates to.

As listed by the trial registrant

The condition terms exactly as the trial's registrant entered them.

Contacts and locations

Locations

  • Hameed Lateef Hospital

    Lahore, Punjab Province, 54000, Pakistan

More trials for these conditions

Other studies related to the condition(s) this trial covers.